About Me

Name: David Van Edema
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Star Trek; Socialist Utopia?

At a recent Star Trek convention held in NYC last week, hard core fans of the series, or "Trekkies", wistfully told reporters of how they wished that their lives were more like that of the popular series.

One fan, Rebecca Brandt, commented that "We are at a very dark time right now. We have to get to the Star Trek point. We're not there yet. We need replicators (futuristic machines that could "recycle" almost anything into something else, usually food). We need to solve world hunger and solve disease".
 
Another fan, 42 year old Wayne Palesado, lamented of how he wished that there was no need for an economy.

"In this future where there is no economics, there is only striving to be what you want to be. When there is no money, how far you want to go in life is up to you."

Ok, time to wake up now.

Yes, times are tough today. They aren't as tough as they were back in the Great Depression, or even in the more recent Carter years, despite what the media or Democrats would have you believe, but we're definitely not at our peak. However, wishing to live in an alternate reality is not going to help us out of this.

I'm betting that most of those Trekkies were Obama voters. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Obama himself was a Star Trek fan. After all, much of the Star Trek universe is similar to his idea of a perfect society.

In the Star Trek universe, there is neither wealth, nor poverty (there is no currency, after all. Everything is obtained through some form of bartering). No one is "better" than anyone else, and we're all on equal footing. Our entire planet is "united" under one government, one leader. As a result, no countries are at war with each other. No one wants more than they absolutely need. They have clean, non-polluting energy sources, such as "dilithium crystals", which powers much of their equipment, most notably starships. Fossil fuels are a thing of the past.

The perfect, utopian socialist paradise.

I'd like to ask Mr. Palesado just how much drive would he really have to "go as far as he'd want to" if there was no economic incentive to do so? What exactly would be his incentive? If no one is allowed to be better than anyone else, than what would the point be to push himself to his limit?
 
Here's something that I've never seen in the Star Trek series... what happens if someone decides to excel at his talents, and wants something in return for it? What if he offers something no one else has? What if he becomes better at something than anyone else? Is he rewarded for his talents, or is he punished for daring to be "better" at something? Is he held back in some manner so as to not ruin the "equal footing" of his fellow citizens?

Don't misunderstand. I don't hate the Star Trek series. I'm no Trekkie, but I've followed the series from watching the old reruns of the 1960's as a kid, to the latest movie release a couple of weeks ago (it's actually very good, and I highly recommend you see it yourself). However, there's a difference between watching a fictional series out of entertainment, even if it does get overly preachy... and modeling your ideals after one. Just because it works in a fictional setting, doesn't mean that it will apply in real world situations.

In the Star Trek series, they've already supposedly conquered all of our current problems. The interesting thing is that the series never really explains how they conquered them. It's just assumed that they already have.

Maybe we should work on how we're actually going to do that in the real world, rather than just modeling our future on the assumption that we will.

Resources:

Can We Live Long and Prosper? Trekkers Hope So. Samantha Gross, AP 5/21/09
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Do Americans Celebrate Cinco de Mayo?

 

Well, tomorrow is “Cinco de Mayo”, or as translated from Spanish, “Fifth of May”.   What’s so special about the fifth of May, you ask? Let me give you a brief history lesson.

Way back in 1861, Mexico tried to back out of interest payments on debts that it owed France. Well, that didn’t make France very happy, so they decided to collect on their debts and invade Mexico. 

Now, believe it or not, France once had the most powerful military in the world. They were actually pretty hard core in those days. You just did not mess with the French army if you knew what was good for you, which is probably why we asked them for their help in the Revolutionary War.    

Anyway, back on point. At first, the French didn’t have too much trouble with the Mexican army. To put it bluntly, they were wiping the floor with them. However, on May 5th, 1862 (“Cinco de Mayo”… ta-da!), in the city of Puebla, they ran into a Mexican army led by a general named Ignacio Zaragoza Seguín.  Long story short, General Seguín kicked the much larger French army out of Pueblo. 

Now, here’s the part that I bet most of you Cinco de Mayo revelers out there don’t know… that battle was the only major victory the Mexicans had over the French. Just a year later, the French had completely taken over Mexico.    It was only after the United States persuaded France to leave, which it did by 1867, that Mexico regained its independence (which, by the way, is frequently mistaken to be Cinco de Mayo itself). 

Here’s the kicker to this holiday; more people in the United States celebrate it than the general populace of Mexico do, with perhaps the exception of Puebla.   In fact, it’s a pretty obscure holiday for the most part down there, kind of like D-Day is here. In the States, however, it’s a different story. You can’t go anywhere without seeing references to the holiday in stores and restaurants. I constantly hear promotions for the holiday on the radio at work. 

So, why is the holiday so special up here? I can understand Mexican nationals celebrating it to a degree. It is a historical event for them, after all, and I don’t expect them to just discard it once they move to the United States, but what’s with all the gringos running around with the ridiculously oversized sombreros on their heads and a bottle of beer in their hands, partying to all hours of the night?   Do they even understand what the holiday is about? I suspect that Cinco de Mayo is seen in the same light as Mardi Gras. Few people understand the history or purpose of Mardi Gras, but just see it as another excuse to party, and maybe overturn a car or two.   At least, until the stampede of police horses come through. Nothing says “the party’s over” like a wooden shampoo to the head. 

Some have argued that Cinco de Mayo has transmuted into a holiday that celebrates Latino culture, kind of like St. Patrick’s Day celebrates Irish culture. St. Patrick, however, was responsible for converting almost the entire nation of Ireland from Paganism to Catholicism, and America, particularly New England, has a large population of Irish descent and heritage, so I can understand why he would be celebrated so widely here.    I just don’t get how one single battle could have morphed into a celebration of Latino culture and pride, especially when so many people celebrating have no Latino in them.   Besides, I wouldn’t exactly call having only one major victory in a war something to be proud of, especially when another country has to bail you out in the end.  

Oh well, like I said earlier, I guess it’s just another excuse for gringos out there to party.   Happy Cinco de Mayo… and oh, watch yourselves on the highways tomorrow.   Lot of liquor stores out there are going to be making some money tomorrow, if you know what I mean.

Sources:

Cinco de Mayo: Wikipedia

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »